Frontdesk
by David Waggoner
If you’ve leafed through a current high school yearbook
lately, you may have noticed something different. The drama
and math clubs are still there, ROTC is still going strong,
but, more and more, Gay/Straight Alliances have been popping
up across the country. Gay, lesbian, bisexual, questioning,
and straight students come together to talk through issues
such as identity and discrimination and support each other
in the process. It’s a way of coming together and a show
of solidarity that we adults could learn from.
That’s what I like about the Bravo television show, Queer
Eye for the Straight Guy. As Kyan Douglas, the show’s “grooming
guru” and this month’s cover interview, describes it, gay
and straight men come together on the common ground of
self-improvement—nurturing their passions, love life, and
style all in one fell swoop. We have plenty of images of
straight women and gay men forming friendships—just turn
on Will & Grace—but we rarely see gay and straight
men as anything but enemies or people from completely different
worlds. With connections like these being made on Queer
Eye, it’s nice to see that even something as “light” as
style doesn’t have to be devoid of substance. I’d like
to see more of this type of bridge-building when it comes
to the AIDS community.
If you listen to the CDC, you would think that people
living with HIV/AIDS are all separated by risk category
and never the twain shall meet. Certainly, some issues
can only be effectively addressed by focusing on a particular
community. Thus, we often have positive gay retreats, Latino
AIDS conferences, and prayer weeks for the healing of AIDS.
The media certainly covers AIDS as if gays are over here
doing their thing and the straights are over there.
Gay men have a lot to teach straight people and straight
people have a lot to teach gay men about living with HIV,
community organizing, and prevention methods. Maybe this
is happening in smaller, less noticeable ways everyday
at AIDS service organizations, churches, and college campuses.
But, yet, we still have support and social groups segregated
by gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Obviously
there are good reasons for this. You might be more comfortable
talking with others who have shared similar experiences.
Or you might have tried the general group and found that
your needs weren’t being met or that your voice was being
stifled. You might find that, as a gay Latino, you are
constantly pulled in different directions, between communities.
We might, however, work toward mixing it up a bit. We might
learn that people who seemingly come from completely different
worlds actually can find common ground. And we might truly
discover how limiting those categories are. When is the
summit where all the different communities come together
as a united front? Am I asking too much, too soon?
With the Presidential elections looming on the horizon,
I keep hearing pundits talk of the “women’s vote,”
the “Latino vote,” and so on. Now we all know that all
women do not share the same politics and pull many different
levers come November, but at least candidates are aware
that there are some core issues out there that many women
have organized around. Wouldn’t it be something if one
day we hear about the “AIDS-affected vote”? Who knows what
we could achieve if we manage to come together like that.